Gallery



Effective connectivity during encoding. Clusters of activation show significant activity differences between young and old adults for items receiving subsequent correct source responses versus those receiving subsequent incorrect source responses. Below, winning models identified using Bayesian model selection for both subsequent recollection and subsequent unsuccessful recollection in each age group (Cansino et al., 2017).




Effective connectivity during retrieval. Clusters of activation show significant activity differences between young and old adults for items receiving correct source responses versus incorrect source responses. Below, winning models identified using Bayesian model selection for both recollection and unsuccessful recollection in each age group (Cansino et al., 2017).




Neurosynth. Database showing brain activations from the article "Effective connectivity during successful and unsuccessful recollection in young and old adults (Cansino et al, 2017).




Neurosynth. Database showing brain activations during context memory encoding in young, middle-aged and older adults (Cansino et al, 2015a).




Neurosynth. Database showing brain activations during context memory retrieval in young, middle-aged, and older adults (Cansino et al, 2015b).




Recognition hits and correct source performance by a continuous life span sample of 1,500 adults (250 from each decade between 21 and 80 years of age) as a function of participant age. Markers of different shape and color distinguish the members of each decade. The solid and dashed lines represent linear, and quadratic regression fits, respectively (Cansino et al., 2013).




Topographic maps recorded in three age groups, depicting the time course of the difference between subsequent correct and incorrect source judgments. Significant differences among the three age groups were observed between 800 and 1200 ms (Cansino et al., 2010).




Topographic maps recorded in three age groups, depicting the time course of the difference between correct and incorrect source judgments. Significant differences (indicated by horizontal lines) were observed between young and middle-aged adults (1200–1600 ms) and among all three age groups (1600–2000 ms) (Cansino et al., 2012).




Lectures organized by the NeuroCognition Laboratory.